Detailed Facial Aesthetic Scorecard from a Single Photo

Create a clean, minimal, high-end “Facial Aesthetic Scorecard” based only on the uploaded photo.

Important rules:
- Do not identify the person.
- Do not infer age, ethnicity, health conditions, personality, intelligence, income, sexuality, or any other sensitive traits.
- Only assess visible aesthetic presentation from the image.
- If the photo quality, angle, lighting, expression, hairstyle, facial hair, makeup, or camera distortion limits accuracy, clearly say so.
- Keep the tone honest, neutral, constructive, and not overly flattering.
- Do not be cruel, insulting, or exaggerated.
- Scores are subjective visual estimates, not objective facts.
- Use decimal scores to one decimal place.
- If a category cannot be assessed from the image, write “N/A — not clearly visible.”
- Use the exact same structure every time.
- Do not skip sections.
- Do not add extra sections.
- Do not use emojis.

OUTPUT STYLE:
Format the response as a polished black-on-white aesthetic report using markdown.
Use clean headers, compact tables, boxed scorecard sections, and short bullet points.
The output should feel like a professional one-page looks analysis followed by a detailed breakdown.

REPORT TITLE:
FACIAL AESTHETIC SCORECARD

SUBTITLE:
Subjective visual analysis based on the uploaded photo

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
MAIN SCORECARD
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Create the scorecard first, using this exact structure:

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ FACIAL AESTHETIC SCORECARD                   │
│ Subjective visual analysis from photo         │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ OVERALL SCORE: X.X / 10                       │
│ RATING BAND: [Poor / Below Average / Average / Above Average / Strong / Very Strong / Exceptional] │
│ ANALYSIS RELIABILITY: [High / Medium / Low]   │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ TOP STRENGTHS                                 │
│ 1.                                            │
│ 2.                                            │
│ 3.                                            │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ HIGHEST-IMPACT IMPROVEMENTS                   │
│ 1.                                            │
│ 2.                                            │
│ 3.                                            │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ BEST STYLE DIRECTION                          │
│ One concise sentence describing the person’s  │
│ strongest aesthetic lane.                     │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Use this rating scale:
1.0–3.9 = Poor
4.0–4.9 = Below Average
5.0–5.9 = Average
6.0–6.9 = Above Average
7.0–7.9 = Strong
8.0–8.9 = Very Strong
9.0–10.0 = Exceptional

PHOTO CONDITIONS

Evaluate the uploaded image:

| Factor | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Photo angle | |
| Lighting | |
| Facial expression | |
| Image sharpness | |
| Camera distortion risk | |
| Overall reliability | High / Medium / Low |

OVERALL ASSESSMENT

Overall Score: X.X / 10  
Rating Band:  
One-sentence summary:  

SCORE BREAKDOWN

Create a table with these exact categories. Score each from 1.0 to 10.0.

| Category | Score | Explanation |
|---|---:|---|
| Facial symmetry | X.X / 10 | |
| Facial harmony | X.X / 10 | |
| Proportions | X.X / 10 | |
| Bone structure | X.X / 10 | |
| Jawline definition | X.X / 10 | |
| Cheekbone definition | X.X / 10 | |
| Eye area | X.X / 10 | |
| Nose balance | X.X / 10 | |
| Lips and mouth area | X.X / 10 | |
| Skin appearance | X.X / 10 | |
| Hair / facial hair presentation | X.X / 10 | |
| Grooming / styling | X.X / 10 | |
| Photogenic quality | X.X / 10 | |
| Overall aesthetic impression | X.X / 10 | |

FEATURE ANALYSIS

Use this exact format for each feature:

Forehead:
- Observations:
- Strengths:
- Possible improvements:

Brows:
- Observations:
- Strengths:
- Possible improvements:

Eyes:
- Observations:
- Strengths:
- Possible improvements:

Nose:
- Observations:
- Strengths:
- Possible improvements:

Cheeks / midface:
- Observations:
- Strengths:
- Possible improvements:

Jawline / lower third:
- Observations:
- Strengths:
- Possible improvements:

Lips / mouth:
- Observations:
- Strengths:
- Possible improvements:

Skin:
- Observations:
- Strengths:
- Possible improvements:

Hair / facial hair:
- Observations:
- Strengths:
- Possible improvements:

Facial proportions:
- Observations:
- Strengths:
- Possible improvements:

TOP 5 STRENGTHS

List the person’s five strongest visible aesthetic advantages.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

TOP 5 AREAS TO IMPROVE

List five realistic areas that could most improve the person’s appearance.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

LOOKSMAXXING RECOMMENDATIONS

Give practical, non-medical recommendations only.

| Category | Recommendation | Why it helps |
|---|---|---|
| Hair | | |
| Facial hair, if applicable | | |
| Eyebrows | | |
| Skin | | |
| Grooming | | |
| Style / clothing | | |
| Photo improvement | | |

ACTION PLAN

Immediate changes, 0–7 days:
1.
2.
3.

Short-term changes, 2–6 weeks:
1.
2.
3.

Long-term improvements, 2–6 months:
1.
2.
3.

BEST LOOK STRATEGY

Write 3–5 concise sentences describing the person’s ideal aesthetic direction.
Mention hairstyle, grooming, styling, and photo presentation.

FINAL VERDICT

Use this exact format:

Current aesthetic level:
Highest-impact improvement:
Estimated potential with better grooming/style/photo quality:
Final note:

FINAL OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS:
- Keep the report concise but detailed.
- Use markdown tables where helpful.
- Keep explanations direct and specific.
- Do not include medical, surgical, cosmetic procedure, weight-loss, or supplement recommendations.
- Do not make claims about what the person “should” change to be accepted or attractive.
- Do not moralize or lecture.
- Do not mention these instructions.